Aadult dating txt 223
Feedback: See AMA Code of Medical Ethics, Sections 8.115 and 9.06. Of the following reasons for refusing to accept a patient, which is the least likely to be an ethical or legal violation? According to the AMA Code of Medical Ethics, Section 10.03, the physician in this situation has a responsibility to inform the patient about important health information or abnormalities that he or she discovers during the course of the examination. Feedback: If the procedure has material risks, the patient should be educated about the benefits of the test and the risks of not getting the test through the informed consent process. This court stated that even though the probability of her getting cancer was low, the risk was death if she did get cancer.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects Patient's obligations to Physician? Patient is legally obligated to notify Physician that he has been dismissed. Patient must give Physician at least a 30-day notice that he will be dismissed. Patient can dismiss Physician for any reason without notification. Patient can dismiss Physician for any reason as long as the reason is not illegal. Patient can dismiss Physician for any reason without notification. Some state laws follow the AMA ethical guidelines for this situation finding liability based on simple negligence principles rather than medical malpractice. Under certain circumstances, a hospital can assume a legal duty to obtain a patient's informed consent, such as when a hospital participates in an investigational clinical study monitored by the FDA.
However, it is unethical to refuse a patient based upon an illegal reason, such as gender, race, religion, national origin, disability, etc. Determine whether it is medically feasible to discontinue the treatment. Patient opens his mouth to allow doctor to see his throat.
Feedback: Generally, a physician may refuse to accept a patient for any reason, except in cases of emergency. Must be obtained if the medical procedure or treatment involves a material risk of harm to the patient. Informed consent must be obtained if the medical procedure or treatment involves a material risk of harm to the patient. Infection, allergic reaction, severe loss of blood, loss or loss of function of any limb or organ, loss of reproductive function, paralysis or partial paralysis, paraplegia or quadriplegia, disfiguring scar, brain damage, cardiac arrest, or death. Material risks include infection, allergic reaction, severe loss of blood, loss or loss of function of any limb or organ, loss of reproductive function, paralysis or partial paralysis, paraplegia or quadriplegia, disfiguring scar, brain damage, cardiac arrest, or death. Patient goes to the doctor for treatment of a sore throat.
What is the primary purpose of the informed consent process? "Absent a court order to the contrary, a health care decision of an agent takes precedence over that of a guardian." The question assumes that the court order appointing the guardian did not revoke the health care agent's authority. If a resident or other physician is to perform the operation under non-participatory supervision, it is necessary to make a full disclosure of this fact to the patient, and this should be evidenced by an appropriate statement contained in the consent. Yes, because the consent form covers every potential contingency. Health Care Agent Feedback: Tennessee Code Section . However, the AMA's Code of Medical Ethics, Section 8.16, states that "a surgeon who allows a substitute to operate on his or her patients without the patient's knowledge and consent is deceitful." The Code further states: "With the consent of the patient, it is not unethical for the operating surgeon to delegate the performance of certain aspects of the operation to the assistant provided this is done under the surgeon's participatory supervision, i.e., the surgeon must scrub. "I consent to the performance of operations and procedures in addition to or different from those contemplated, whether or not arising from presently unforeseen conditions, which the above named physician or his associates or assistants may consider necessary or advisable in the course of the operation." a. It is unethical for a physician to have a sexual or romantic relationship with a former patient if the physician uses or exploits trust, knowledge, emotions, or influence derived from the previous professional relationship. Physician performs the procedure, and Patient sustains severe injury. Which of the following is Patient's strongest argument to hold Specialist liable? The alleged negligence occurred during the implementation of the procedure. The need for Specialist's services extended beyond performance of the procedure. The Patient believed that Specialist continued to be her physician beyond the performance of the procedure. Specialist did not withdraw as Patient's physician prior to the performance of the procedure. The alleged negligence occurred in the decision to perform the procedure. The alleged negligence occurred in the decision to perform the procedure. Feedback: This is not a curbside consultation because Specialist examined Patient. Feedback: Although a physician may terminate the relationship with a noncompliant patient, the physician must give adequate notice so that the patient has time to find another health care provider. The type of consent that must be obtained before touching the patient. General consent must be obtained before touching the patient. The legal claim against a physician if either the patient isn't aware that the physician was going to perform the procedure or the patient hasn't authorized it. Medical battery is the legal claim against a physician if either the patient isn't aware that the physician was going to perform the procedure or the patient hasn't authorized it. Patient, who is 50 years old, refuses to get a pap smear. Refuse because ethical considerations require at least a three-year waiting period to date a former patient. Feedback: It is unethical for any physician to have a romantic relationship with a current patient. Tennessee has yet to accept or reject the concept of a "curbside consultation." To the extent a physician affirmatively participates in the treatment or diagnosis, as opposed to expressing an opinion, Tennessee is likely to find a physician-patient relationship, even though the consulting physician did not examine the patient. Specialist examines Patient and agrees with Physician that the procedure would be appropriate for Patient. The need for his services ended after he gave his opinion. Which of the following is not an acceptable method for terminating the physician-patient relationship? Physician and patient agree to end the relationship. Patient unilaterally decides to receive his medical care from another physician. Physician informs a noncompliant patient that physician will no longer see him as a patient. A consulting physician signs off in the medical chart when his services are no longer needed. Physician sends a letter to patient giving him 30 days to find another health care provider. Physician informs a noncompliant patient that physician will no longer see him as a patient. Nurse does not completely understand the procedure and fails to mention that a recognized material risk of the procedure is death. If Patient's family sues, who is the one most likely to be held responsible for failing to obtain informed consent?